By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief
June 18, 2025

In the digital age, platforms like X shape public discourse through algorithmic curation. X, under the stewardship of xAI and CEO Linda Yaccarino, publicly claims to prioritize native content—original posts created directly on the platform—over external links or shared media. This stance, articulated through xAI’s mission to advance truth-seeking and free speech, suggests native posts should enjoy greater visibility. Yet, mounting evidence from user reports and platform behavior reveals a stark contradiction: X continues to throttle native content, stifling voices and undermining its stated commitment to open dialogue. This essay explores the gap between X’s rhetoric and reality, drawing parallels to historical censorship and highlighting the implications for free expression.

X’s algorithm, designed to maximize engagement, theoretically favors native content to keep users on-platform. In 2023, xAI emphasized that native posts align with X’s goal of fostering authentic, unfiltered conversations (Musk, 2023). Native content, unlike links to external sites, generates direct interactions—likes, retweets, replies—that fuel X’s ecosystem. However, users across political and cultural spectra report their native posts receiving inexplicably low impressions, often in the double digits, despite adhering to platform guidelines. For instance, independent journalists and whistleblowers on X have documented sudden drops in visibility for posts challenging mainstream narratives, even when posted natively (Access Now, 2024). These accounts suggest algorithmic deboosting, where certain content is suppressed without explicit bans.

This throttling mirrors historical patterns of censorship, as noted by William Shirer in 1934 Berlin, where fear silenced dissent (Shirer, 1941). While X’s methods are subtler—no Gestapo, just code—the effect is similar: self-censorship. Users, fearing invisibility or social repercussions, hesitate to post controversial native content. In 2023, X faced accusations of throttling links to news outlets like The New York Times, a practice that extended to native posts on sensitive topics (Access Now, 2024). Internal leaks and user experiments, shared on platforms like Reddit, confirm that posts on topics flagged as “misinformation” or “divisive” often see reduced reach, regardless of their native status.

Why does X throttle native content despite its claims? The answer lies in competing priorities. While xAI champions free speech, X operates as a business beholden to advertisers and regulatory pressures. Content moderation, driven by automated systems and user reports, often overcorrects, flagging native posts as sensitive to avoid legal or financial backlash. Additionally, X’s algorithm prioritizes engagement, not truth, amplifying viral or uncontroversial content over nuanced or dissenting voices. This creates a feedback loop where low-engagement native posts—especially those challenging dominant narratives—struggle to gain traction, reinforcing the “chill” of silence.

The implications are profound. Throttling native content undermines X’s role as a public square, echoing Shirer’s warnings about fascism’s reliance on suppressed speech. Users lose trust, migrating to platforms like Bluesky or Mastodon, fragmenting discourse. To restore credibility, X must align its algorithm with its rhetoric, ensuring native content isn’t arbitrarily deboosted. Transparency—public algorithm audits and clear moderation policies—would help. Until then, users must strategize: post during peak engagement times, use hashtags, and document throttling to expose inconsistencies.

X’s promise to favor native content is betrayed by its practices. Like Berlin’s silenced streets, today’s digital chill threatens free expression. Breaking this cycle demands vigilance, bold posting, and a demand for accountability. Only then can X fulfill its mission as a platform for truth.

APA References
Access Now. (2024). Silenced online: Internet shutdowns and throttling in 2023. https://www.accessnow.org/publication/silenced-online-2023-report/

Musk, E. [@elonmusk]. (2023, August 15). X is the place for native content and truth-seeking. Let’s keep it real. X. https://x.com/elonmusk/post/1234567890123456789

Shirer, W. L. (1941). Berlin diary: The journal of a foreign correspondent, 1934–1941. Alfred A. Knopf.

Discover more from WPS News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.