Oligarchy and Inequality: The Prelude to War

By WPS News Political Correspondent
Baybay City | January 5, 2026

The specter of oligarchy looms large over contemporary American society, characterized by a concentration of wealth and power that increasingly excludes the voices of the working class. Former President Jimmy Carter’s assertion that the U.S. resembles an oligarchy resonates strongly today, given the barriers that marginalized communities face in seeking justice and representation. This scenario creates an environment ripe for conflict—a reality that the writings of various philosophers help illuminate.

As we reflect on the teachings of thinkers like Marx and Hegel, it becomes clear that when immense power rests in the hands of a few, and their interests clash with the needs of the masses, the likelihood of conflict escalates. Marx’s analysis of class struggle reveals that revolutions often erupt when the oppressed become conscious of their exploitation. With the masses increasingly aware of the widening gap between themselves and the ruling elite, it is no wonder that tensions are rising.

Hegel posited that conflict is an essential aspect of societal evolution. This perspective applies directly to today’s struggles as disenfranchised groups fight to claim their place in a system that has neglected them. When the elite feel entitled to their positions—believing they possess the divine right of kings—the marginalized masses often feel compelled to resist, culminating in social unrest or outright conflict.

The words of Thomas Hobbes also resonate in this context, as he warned of the chaos that arises in the absence of just authority. Today, many perceive that those in power not only fail to represent the interests of the people but actively work to maintain their grip on authority. This disenfranchisement leads to feelings of hopelessness and desperation among the populace, exacerbating tensions and increasing the likelihood of conflict.

Friedrich Nietzsche offers another lens through which to view this dilemma. His assertion that struggle is intrinsic to human existence points to a deeper truth: when the ruling class rigidly defends their power and ignores the needs of the masses, they foster a climate ripe for rebellion. The belief that violence is sometimes a necessary response to oppression is not merely a reflection of desperation; it is rooted in a long history of struggle against tyranny.

As we analyze the phrase “the right of kings,” we must recognize how this mentality persists today. Many elite individuals—whether they are politicians, business leaders, or media moguls—often operate under the assumption that their interests should take precedence over the collective well-being of society. This not only leads to policy decisions that prioritize wealth accumulation for the few at the expense of the many but also alienates the very citizens who are the lifeblood of a functioning democracy.

The implications of this current socio-political climate cannot be overstated. When nonviolent avenues for change appear blocked, and the ruling class remains unyielding, history shows that societies may turn to conflict as a last resort. The ramifications of such actions can be profound, resulting in loss of life, destruction, and long-standing societal divisions.

However, we must also consider the role of nonviolent resistance as a powerful counterpoint to this narrative. Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence demonstrated that strength can arise from unity and moral conviction. Peaceful protest has been an effective strategy in many movements worldwide, showing that the masses do not always need to bear arms to enact change. Yet, for nonviolent strategies to be effective, the ruling class must be willing to acknowledge and address the grievances of the people.

As we navigate these challenging times, it is imperative for us to promote reforms that address systemic inequalities and restore faith in our democratic institutions. Recognizing the significance of class dynamics and the potential for conflict can serve as a wake-up call for both citizens and leaders. A renewed commitment to inclusive governance, open dialogue, and addressing the needs of all citizens is essential if we are to avert further descent into violence.

In conclusion, the intersection of philosophy and current socio-political realities reveals a grim outlook if the status quo persists. If we allow the tensions between the ruling class and the masses to fester unchecked, we may ultimately find ourselves at a crossroads—one that could lead to conflict and upheaval. By acknowledging the wisdom of past thinkers and striving for equitable solutions, we can work to ensure that the next chapter of our history is one of healing rather than discord.