By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

What Happened in Minneapolis

Alex Pretti, a U.S. citizen and ICU nurse, was killed by federal immigration agents on a public street in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Video evidence and eyewitness reporting show that Pretti was not participating in an organized protest, was not attempting to attack federal agents, and was not engaged in any assassination attempt. He was present on a public street during an enforcement operation and was, by multiple accounts, recording events as they unfolded.

Despite this, senior officials in the Trump administration rapidly advanced claims that framed Pretti as a violent threat. These claims were made before any independent investigation was completed and in direct contradiction to publicly available evidence.

This rush to narrative control — rather than fact-finding — is the core issue.

Trump’s Claims: From “Threat” to “Assassin”

President Donald Trump publicly suggested that Alex Pretti posed a deadly danger to ICE agents and, at one point, allowed accusations to circulate that Pretti was present to assassinate federal officers. No evidence has been produced to support this claim.

Even when Trump later softened his language, the damage had already been done. The administration’s messaging established a false premise: that the killing was justified because Pretti was allegedly violent. That premise is not supported by video evidence, witness accounts, or subsequent reporting.

False accusations of assassination are not rhetorical slips. They are serious claims that, when untrue, represent a fundamental abuse of executive power and public trust.

Kash Patel and the FBI: Misstating the Law

FBI Director Kash Patel compounded the situation by asserting that individuals cannot lawfully carry firearms in public situations such as demonstrations or enforcement scenes — a statement that conflicts with established interpretations of state and federal law.

This assertion drew criticism from legal scholars and gun-rights organizations alike. It was not merely incorrect; it reframed constitutional protections in a way that retroactively justified lethal force.

When the head of the FBI publicly misstates the law to defend a killing, it signals institutional failure — not public safety.

Kristi Noem and DHS: Defending the Indefensible

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem publicly defended the actions of ICE agents and echoed claims that Pretti represented a legitimate threat. These defenses were issued before any transparent review and relied on the same disputed narrative advanced by the White House.

Rather than pausing for investigation, DHS leadership chose to reinforce a storyline that criminalized a civilian victim. This pattern — immediate exoneration of federal force paired with character assassination of the deceased — has become a hallmark of authoritarian governance.

The NRA’s Position: Narrow, but Telling

The National Rifle Association did not issue a broad condemnation of the Trump administration. However, the NRA did criticize specific statements made by federal officials that implied lawful gun ownership nullifies constitutional protections when confronted by law enforcement.

The NRA labeled that reasoning “dangerous and wrong” and called for a full investigation. While limited in scope, this response is notable: even a traditionally pro-law-enforcement organization rejected the administration’s legal framing.

That rejection matters. It underscores how far the administration’s narrative drifted from established legal norms.

A Pattern, Not an Isolated Incident

WPS News views the Minneapolis killing not as a standalone tragedy but as part of a broader pattern:

  • Immediate false claims by executive leadership
  • Premature exoneration of federal agents
  • Public smearing of victims
  • Legal distortions by senior officials
  • Resistance to independent oversight

History shows that governments which repeatedly lie to justify state violence do not retain democratic legitimacy indefinitely. Legitimacy depends on truth, accountability, and the rule of law — all of which were undermined here.

WPS News Position

WPS News holds the following position:

  • The Trump administration knowingly misrepresented the circumstances surrounding Alex Pretti’s killing.
  • Senior officials — including the President, the FBI Director, and the Secretary of Homeland Security — made demonstrably false or misleading statements.
  • These actions constitute evidence of an illegitimate government operating outside democratic norms.

We maintain that Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and members of the Trump cabinet should face impeachment, and that any officials involved in criminal misconduct should be investigated and prosecuted under the law.

This is not a call for disorder. It is a call for constitutional accountability.

Conclusion: Truth Is the First Casualty of Illegitimate Power

Governments that tell the truth do not fear investigation. Governments that lie rush to control narratives, smear the dead, and redefine the law after bullets are fired.

The United States deserves better than this.

WPS News will continue to document, analyze, and challenge abuses of power — not as partisan theater, but as historical record.

APA References

Associated Press. (2026, January). Federal agents shoot Minnesota man during ICE operation.
Reuters. (2026, January). U.S. officials defend agents after Minneapolis shooting as questions mount.
The Guardian. (2026, January). Gun rights groups criticize federal rhetoric after Alex Pretti killing.
Newsweek. (2026, January). FBI director faces backlash over comments on gun rights and protests.
Washington Post. (2026, January). Video contradicts early official claims in Minneapolis ICE shooting.

Discover more from WPS News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.