By Cliff Potts, WPS News

For more than two decades, Google AdSense has been presented as a democratizing tool—a way for independent writers, bloggers, and small news sites to monetize their work simply by allowing Google to place ads alongside it. The promise is straightforward: create content, attract readers, and earn revenue. The reality, for most small publishers, is far less generous.

At scale, AdSense works. For multinational media companies, high-traffic entertainment platforms, and corporate news outlets pushing millions of impressions per day, the model can generate substantial revenue. For independent publishers, niche writers, and small online newspapers, AdSense functions less as income and more as a symbolic participation ribbon—proof that one is “monetized,” without meaningful compensation.

The Numbers Behind the Promise

Google does not hide the basic economics. AdSense revenue is typically measured in CPM (cost per thousand impressions) or RPM (revenue per thousand page views). Globally, average CPMs for small publishers often range from $0.20 to $2.50, depending on geography, niche, and advertiser demand. After Google’s revenue share—widely estimated at 32% retained by Google for AdSense for content—the publisher’s take is reduced further.

For a small site generating 10,000 page views per month, a generous RPM of $2.00 yields roughly $20 monthly. Many publishers report far less: $5–$15 per month, even with consistent posting and modest audience growth. At that rate, a year of continuous publishing may not cover the cost of a single utility bill, let alone labor, hosting, research, or reporting expenses.

This is not a failure of effort. It is a structural outcome.

Scale as a Gatekeeper

AdSense is optimized for volume. The system rewards mass traffic, broad appeal, and advertiser-friendly demographics. Small publishers—particularly those producing investigative journalism, regional reporting, long-form analysis, or politically sensitive material—rarely generate the click-through rates or impression volume required to matter economically.

In practice, AdSense does not encourage quality or originality. It encourages scale, speed, and constant churn. The algorithm does not care whether a piece took five minutes or five weeks to write. It pays only for exposure, not substance.

This creates a perverse incentive: thoughtful work subsidizes the platform, while shallow, repetitive, or sensational content captures the revenue.

Consent Without Choice

Small publishers are frequently told that participation is voluntary. If AdSense does not pay enough, they are free to leave. In theory, this is true. In practice, it is meaningless.

Google dominates online advertising infrastructure. For many independent sites, AdSense is not chosen because it is ideal, but because it is the only practical option with global reach, low barriers to entry, and automated payments. Alternatives exist, but most require traffic thresholds, sales teams, or sponsorship relationships inaccessible to small operators.

When participation is the only viable path to any monetization at all, “consent” becomes indistinguishable from coercion.

Extraction as a Business Model

What AdSense reliably does is extract value. Independent publishers supply content, audience attention, and legitimacy. Google supplies ads and infrastructure—and captures the majority of the economic upside.

The publisher assumes the risk: time, expertise, hosting costs, legal exposure, and reputational harm. Google assumes none of these and still profits from every impression served. This is not partnership. It is asymmetric extraction.

The system normalizes unpaid or underpaid creative labor by reframing exposure as opportunity and pennies as progress. Over time, this erodes the expectation that writing, reporting, or analysis should be compensated at all.

Why It Persists

The endurance of this model rests on three factors:

  1. Opacity – Revenue is fragmented, delayed, and difficult to predict, obscuring how little money actually changes hands.
  2. Normalization – Low payouts are treated as inevitable rather than interrogated as structural failure.
  3. Audience Detachment – Readers consume content without seeing the economic conditions under which it is produced.

Together, these forces sustain a system in which creators are encouraged to keep producing while being quietly written out of the value chain.

What AdSense Actually Delivers

For most small publishers, Google AdSense does not provide income. It provides the appearance of monetization—a badge of legitimacy that benefits the platform far more than the people who generate the content.

This is not an accident. It is how the system is designed to function.

For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

References (APA)

Colvin, G. (2010). Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else. Portfolio.
European Commission. (2017). Antitrust: Commission fines Google €2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine.
Google. (2023). AdSense revenue sharing information. Google Help Center.
McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. The New Press.

Discover more from WPS News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.