The Complex Legacy of War: A Year of Reflection

By: Cliff Potts & Staff Writers, WPS News
Baybay City | December 31, 2025

Over the past twelve months, WPS News has explored the multifaceted philosophies surrounding war and its justifications. While many would prefer to ignore the realities of conflict, it is undeniable that war has played a significant role as a social institution, often serving as a method to resolve deep-seated issues that remain unresolved through diplomatic means. Throughout history, various conflicts have shaped societies, bringing both resolution and devastation.

One of the most notable examples is World War II, which served not only as a confrontation between opposing ideologies but also as a catalyst for significant social change. In the wake of the war, the establishment of the United Nations in 1945 marked a pivotal shift in how nations approached diplomacy, emphasizing the need for cooperative dialogue over armed conflict. The war’s conclusion allowed for the dismantling of colonial empires, paving the way for independence movements across Asia and Africa. These movements addressed longstanding social injustices and inequalities that had persisted for centuries. However, the human cost was staggering, with millions of lives lost, forcing societies to grapple with the ramifications of such sacrifices.

Another significant event that exemplifies war as a means of social resolution is the American Civil War. Fought from 1861 to 1865, the war ended the enslavement of African Americans and led to significant constitutional changes, including the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. Despite the profound cost in human life and suffering, the Civil War achieved what decades of political maneuvering could not—freedom for millions of individuals and a step toward civil rights. Yet, the scars of this conflict remain evident in contemporary society, raising questions about the true nature of resolution through violence.

Ashis Nandy, an eminent social psychologist and cultural critic, provides a unique lens through which we can examine the phenomenon of war. Nandy argues that war is often a product of cultural and psychological factors, positing that the narratives surrounding conflict are instrumental in shaping societal norms and identities. He suggests that the stories we tell ourselves about “the enemy” and the justifications for violence pave the way for societal acceptance of war as a solution to conflict.

According to Nandy, the glorification of war in popular culture contributes to a collective psyche that romanticizes conflict rather than encourages dialogue. This inclination to embrace militaristic solutions is evident in various societies, where historical narratives often overshadow alternative approaches. Nandy emphasizes the importance of recognizing these narratives and their influence on contemporary views of conflict. By reshaping our understanding of war, societies may move toward more peaceful resolutions in the future.

The examination of wars and their justifications over the past year has highlighted a key paradox: while war has resolved some social issues, it has invariably created others. The resolution of conflicts often comes at a tremendous price, questioning whether the outcomes justify the means employed. In multiple instances, the aftermath of war reveals that the solutions may be temporary, leading to cycles of violence and further strife rather than permanent change.

As we continue to reflect on the philosophies of war and its implications, it becomes clear that there is no easy answer. War is a complex social institution, forged by historical necessity but often resulting in devastating consequences. The narratives we embrace, as outlined by Nandy, play a crucial role in shaping our understanding of conflict and its place in society.

In conclusion, as we digest the reflections from the past year, it is imperative to consider both the historical context and the narratives that drive societies toward war. Moving forward, perhaps a greater emphasis on dialogue, understanding, and cultural awareness can illuminate paths to resolution that do not involve the loss of life. By engaging with the complexities of war and critically analyzing its philosophical justifications, we may be better equipped to address the underlying issues that perpetuate conflict in our world today.

Epilogue: Moving Forward into 2026—A New Understanding of Conflict

As we enter 2026, the lessons of this tumultuous decade highlight the need for a deeper understanding of human motivations behind conflicts. Our exploration of philosophical insights has revealed that catastrophic outcomes often stem from cultural narratives, historical grievances, and psychological patterns. Scholars like Ashis Nandy remind us to examine the stories we tell, urging us to seek alternatives to violence through dialogue and empathy.

This decade has underscored the importance of addressing social injustices and economic disparities, showing that divisive ideologies only deepen divides. Moving forward, we must adopt a proactive approach to conflict prevention, emphasizing cultural awareness and constructive conversation. Together, schools, communities, and nations need to cultivate environments where understanding and cooperation can thrive.

As we embrace the new year, let us commit to fostering peace through education that promotes compassion and inclusivity. With a shared understanding of our humanity, we can break the cycles of violence that have plagued us. The path ahead may be challenging, but equipped with the insights of the past, we can work towards a future marked by cooperation and harmony.