By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News
BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, July 16, 2026 — 0707 PHT

Support WPS News:
https://www.patreon.com/WPSNews

The Case Moves From Words to Records

The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is turning toward the money trail.

After opening with the politically explosive Article IV allegations involving Duterte’s public remarks about President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez, the Senate impeachment court is now moving closer to Article I: the alleged misuse of ₱612.5 million in confidential funds.

That does not mean the threat allegation is finished. It means the prosecution appears to be narrowing that part of the case and preparing to shift toward the financial records, bank documents, tax records, and fund-disbursement evidence that may decide whether this trial becomes more than another round in the Marcos-Duterte political war.

The Tax and Bank Records Fight

On Wednesday, July 15, senator-judges deferred action on the prosecution’s request to subpoena the tax and bank records of Duterte and her husband, lawyer Manases Carpio, until Monday, July 20. Senate impeachment court presiding officer Francis “Chiz” Escudero said the senator-judges needed more time to study the memoranda submitted by both sides after oral arguments. (GMA News Online, 2026a)

The prosecution argues that the records are material to the impeachment case and may help establish allegations of unexplained wealth. The defense argues the request has no sufficient factual or legal basis, violates privacy and due process, and amounts to a fishing expedition — in plain English, that prosecutors are still looking for evidence instead of presenting evidence they already have. (GMA News Online, 2026a)

That is the real fight now. If the Senate grants access to those records, the trial moves into dangerous territory for Duterte. If the Senate refuses, prosecutors will have to prove the financial allegations without some of the documents they clearly want.

Subpoenas Approved on Confidential Funds

The stronger development is that the impeachment court approved subpoenas for witnesses and documents tied to Duterte’s alleged misuse of confidential funds. The subpoenas concern Article I, which covers the alleged misuse of ₱612.5 million: ₱500 million from the Office of the Vice President and ₱112.5 million from the Department of Education. (GMA News Online, 2026b)

The court approved subpoenas for Marivic Pareja, director of the House Legislative Archives and Museum Management Service; Violeta Constantino, former Land Bank Shaw Boulevard branch manager; and Nenita Camposano, former Land Bank DepEd branch manager. The court also approved a subpoena duces tecum for Land Bank president and CEO Lynette Ortiz, meaning documents or other evidence may be required, not just testimony. The witnesses are scheduled to appear on July 21 and 22. (GMA News Online, 2026b)

That matters. Video clips and public statements make headlines. Bank records and fund trails decide cases. This is where the prosecution either proves a pattern or starts losing altitude.

Article IV Gets Narrower

The prosecution has also trimmed its witness list for Article IV, the article involving alleged grave threats and the supposed assassination plot. House prosecution lead Rep. Gerville Luistro told the impeachment court that National Bureau of Investigation Director Melvin Matibag will testify on Tuesday, July 21, and will be the prosecution’s last witness on that article. (GMA News Online, 2026b)

Prosecutors also dropped several other witnesses they had originally planned to present on the threats allegation, saying they already had sufficient evidence after video authentication and the defense’s admission that the videos were authentic. That is a calculated move. The prosecution seems to be saying: we do not need to beat this into the ground. We showed the clips, established the videos, and now we move to the money.

What It Means

The trial is still political. Nobody should pretend otherwise. Duterte is a likely 2028 presidential contender, Marcos cannot seek another term, and the collapse of the Marcos-Duterte alliance hangs over every hearing.

But the trial is also becoming more concrete. The next stage is not just about insults, threats, or dynastic warfare. It is about records. Tax filings. Bank documents. Land Bank testimony. Confidential funds. Paper trails.

That is where the smell of politics either gets overtaken by evidence or exposed as the main engine of the case.

For now, the headline is simple: the Sara Duterte impeachment trial has turned toward the money trail. The Senate’s July 20 decision on tax and bank records may tell us how far down that trail the court is willing to go.

APA-Style Source List:

GMA News Online. (2026a, July 15). Senate impeachment court defers action on Sara Duterte tax, bank records.

GMA News Online. (2026b, July 15). Impeachment court okays subpoenas for witnesses in Sara Duterte’s confidential funds “misuse.”

Discover more from WPS News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.