A Statistical Love Letter to Our Audience
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Pahrump, Nevada, USA
October 25, 2026 — Why Not?
WPS News would like to formally and enthusiastically thank our combined 15,000 followers across WTFM.lol and WPS.news on Bluesky for fully embracing the modern internet’s most sacred principle: information is free, attention is optional, and participation is apparently a bridge too far.
We mean this sincerely. Truly. From the bottom of our analytics dashboard.
A Standing Ovation for One Visit
Over the course of the entire 2025 news cycle, WPS News recorded 6,368 visitors.
Occupy 2.5 recorded 3,483 visitors.
That’s just over 9,000 total visits across two sites.
Now, statistically speaking — not personally, not morally, not spiritually — this means that each of our roughly 15,000 followers managed to visit one of our sites once during the entire year.
Once.
Please, take a moment.
Let that sink in.
We would applaud here, but we don’t use emojis in our news. This is journalism, not a reaction GIF economy.
Free Was Still Too Expensive
This is the part that fascinates us most.
The journalism was free.
The archives were free.
The explanations were free.
The sourcing was free.
The citations were free.
And yet — no comments.
No discussion.
No disagreement.
No engagement.
No funding.
Not even the “angry guy who misread the article and is furious about it anyway,” traditionally the backbone of public discourse.
As the late Art Bell liked to demonstrate night after night, broadcasting only works if someone is actually listening. We appear to have achieved the digital equivalent of transmitting into deep space and hoping the static writes back.
Noise, Fluff, and the Comfort of Familiar Lies
So we’re left with questions.
Is there simply too much noise out there?
Do you no longer know the difference between journalism, opinion, fluff, and algorithmic filler?
Or is it that you say you hate mainstream media — while continuing to consume it exclusively because it feels “reputable”?
There is comfort in familiar packaging.
There is safety in sugar-coated donuts of information.
There is reassurance in news that explains just enough and then stops.
Independent journalism, by contrast, does something deeply unsettling: it shows its work.
Sources.
Documents.
Context.
Links.
Receipts.
Apparently, that makes us suspicious.
The Reputability Paradox
Mainstream media is trusted because it is big.
Independent media is distrusted because it is small.
Never mind that the same conglomerates have been wrong, late, or complicit more times than we can count. Never mind that independent journalists routinely break stories that are later “confirmed” by major outlets.
Trust, it turns out, is not about accuracy.
It’s about branding.
And branding, unfortunately, doesn’t come free.
Engagement Is Not a Subscription Plan
Here’s the part that really stings — not emotionally, but mathematically.
You followed us.
You amplified us.
You nodded along in silence.
But following is not reading.
Liking is not engaging.
And silence is not participation.
Journalism without readers is just labor shouted into the void — and the void, we’ve learned, is extremely well-populated.
A Final Thank You, With Feeling
So thank you. Truly.
Thank you for following.
Thank you for scrolling.
Thank you for statistically stopping by once a year.
We appreciate your support in theory, your engagement in abstraction, and your belief in independent journalism as long as it does not require time, attention, money, or response.
We will continue anyway.
Because someone has to document the absurdity of an information economy where news is free, trust is branded, and participation is optional — and where the loudest complaint is always about “the media,” spoken by people who refuse to read it.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
APA-Style References
McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New Press.
Nichols, J., & McChesney, R. W. (2010). The death and life of American journalism. Nation Books.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Discover more from WPS News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
